可申請地區
支援申請或可正常開卡使用
美國US
- 證據來源
- 官方支援
U 卡資料庫 / Mastercard / Visa / 加密預付卡
T
Trocador Prepaid Card
更新時間: 2026年8月1日
Trocador Prepaid Cards 是 Trocador 提供的第三方虛擬預付卡購買服務。使用者無須建立長期銀行卡帳戶，即可使用 BTC、XMR、ETH、USDT、USDC 等數位資產購買固定美元面額的 Visa 或 Mastercard。目前產品包括國際使用方案及美國限定方案，卡片主要用於線上購物，並可依具體發卡方案連結行動支付錢包。
已確認未上架 App Store
官方與公司資訊
發行方身分與公司資質概覽
Trocador.app 由 Reta Development Assets LLC 擁有並管理，主要提供非託管加密資產兌換聚合、AnonPay、禮品卡和預付卡購買入口。Trocador 負責訂單介面、加密資產支付路由和客戶協助，但不是銀行或實際發卡機構。Swype 卡由 Reloadly 旗下 Swype 計畫管理，現行條款將 Regions Bank 列為發卡銀行；其他美國限定卡的具體發行主體以兌換頁面及持卡人協議為準。
卡片概覽
使用者進入 Trocador 的 Prepaid Cards 頁面，選擇卡片供應商、面額及付款資產，提供接收兌換連結的電子郵件，再向訂單地址傳送加密資產。付款確認後，使用者透過第三方卡片供應商頁面啟用虛擬卡，並查看卡號、有效期限、安全碼及餘額。卡片以預付餘額消費，不提供透支或信用額度，也不支援直接提領加密資產。不同卡片產品分別適用於國際或美國境內交易，啟用資料、商家限制、行動錢包、外匯費、餘額有效期限和身分審核均由實際卡片供應商執行。
Mastercard / Visa 卡片體驗地區可用性權益條款可能變動
提示: 目前沒有其他提示。
卡片形態與費用差異
比較不同卡片形態與等級的已核驗費用紀錄
按住或滑動表格任意區域，左右查看全部卡片；左側項目保持固定
T Trocador Swype 國際 Mastercard | T Trocador 美國獎勵 Visa 卡 | T Trocador MyPrepaidCenter 萬事達卡 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 卡片形態 | 虛擬卡 | 虛擬卡 | 虛擬卡 |
| 費用 | |||
| 月費 | 2.5 USD 自第二個月起持續收取 | 免費 不收月度維護費用 | 免費 不收月度維護費用 |
| 開卡費 | 2 USD 每張卡固定發行費用 | 2 USD 每張卡固定發行費用 | 2 USD 每張卡固定發行費用 |
| ATM 提款費 | — | — | — |
| 貨幣轉換費 | 0.55 USD + 2.75% 每筆外幣交易收取 | — | 2% 境外或非美元交易收取 |
| 儲值費 | 3% 依購買卡片金額計算 | 3% 依購買卡片金額計算 | 3% 依購買卡片金額計算 |
| 交易失敗費 | 0.15 USD 按交易地區及類型收取，金額為0.15至0.55美元 | — | — |
| 獎勵 | |||
| 現金回饋 | — | — | — |
| 加密貨幣回饋 | — | — | — |
| 質押獎勵 | — | — | — |
| 質押年利率 | — | — | — |
| 歡迎獎勵 | — | — | — |
| 推薦獎勵 | — | — | — |
| 限制 | |||
| 每日支出上限 | 1,000 USD 受卡片預付餘額限制 | 1,000 USD 受單張卡片餘額限制 | 1,000 USD 受單張卡片餘額限制 |
| 每月支出上限 | — | — | — |
| ATM 提款上限 | — | — | — |
| 卡片網路 |
費用可能因地區、卡片等級與官方政策而變動，請核對最新官方條款。
地區與中國地區適用性
依公開來源、官方政策與使用者回報整理申請狀態，不構成辦卡建議。
不支援或受限地區
申請或部分功能不可用或受限
古巴CU敘利亞SY北韓KP伊朗IR
- 證據來源
- 官方限制
尚未確認地區
證據不足，狀態有待確認
沒有紀錄
- 證據來源
- 公開資料
中國地區適用性
以下保留資料原文。
原文
1、中国大陆：不可申请，美国限定卡不可申请；Swype Mastercard 须通过供应商地区及身份审核，可在支持 Mastercard 的线上商户和移动钱包使用。
2、香港：不可申请，美国限定卡不可申请；Swype Mastercard 须通过供应商实名验证，可在支持 Mastercard 的线上和非接触式商户使用
3、澳门：不可申请，美国限定卡不可申请；Swype Mastercard 的购买及激活受供应商风控约束，可在国际卡受理商户消费。
4、台湾：不可申请，美国限定卡不可申请；Swype Mastercard 须通过地区及身份审核，可在支持 Mastercard 的线上和移动钱包商户使用。
更新時間: 2026年8月1日
KYC 要求
開戶前目前核驗的身分驗證要求與限制
是否需要 KYC
是需要KYC 等級
分級 KYC要求已確認居住證明
否不需要支援證件
駕駛執照 / 政府核發身分證件
審核時間 / 地區限制
一般卡片線上啟用，身分、地區或交易風險異常時轉為人工合規複核
KYC 服務商
未揭露
更新時間
2026年8月1日
支付相容性
各類支付情境的支援狀態與更新時間 · 實際可用性可能受地區、商家與發行方政策影響
相容性概覽12 個情境
支援5
不支援7
更新時間2026年8月1日
行動錢包付款
Alipay
不支援
2026年8月1日
行動錢包付款
Apple Pay
支援
2026年8月1日
現金服務
ATM 提款
不支援
2026年8月1日
AI 工具
ChatGPT
不支援
2026年8月1日
AI 工具
Claude
不支援
2026年8月1日
行動錢包付款
Google Pay
支援
2026年8月1日
AI 工具
Midjourney
不支援
2026年8月1日
實體付款
實體 POS
支援
2026年8月1日
線上購物
線上購物
支援
2026年8月1日
行動錢包付款
PayPal
不支援
2026年8月1日
訂閱服務
訂閱付款
支援
2026年8月1日
行動錢包付款
WeChat Pay
不支援
2026年8月1日
使用者評論
顯示 10 則已核准且符合此卡片的評論
The process was easy.
The process was easy.
I did sent XMR to receive SOL to a Wallet and it took some time because Monero takes usually some time.
After 10 confirmations of Monero Blockchain I contacted the Service with Telegram because SOL wasn't still there.
The support answered early and solved this transaction successfully
查看原文 This is my genuine experiencefjng Order Number:ktpqdweYvA
This is my genuine experience, and I am not writing this review just to give Trocador a positive rating.
I encountered an issue with an exchange made through Trocador’s website. I was concerned at first, but the Trocador team handled the situation with patience and professionalism. They took the time to communicate with me, investigate the issue, and finally helped resolve it successfully.
What impressed me most was their willingness to support users when problems occurred. This experience gave me more confidence in using Trocador, knowing that there is a responsible team behind the service.
I believe Trocador is a reliable platform and I would recommend it to others looking for a safer and more trustworthy exchange experience. This review is based on my real experience and honest opinion.
查看原文 One of the best customer services I…
One of the best customer services I have ever experience.
Very quick reply. Friendly. And could resolve my problem within minutes.
Absolutely recommendable!
查看原文 Excellent aggregator - but watch out
Excellent aggregator - should be invented if he didn't already exist. Just be aware that there are black sheep among his "partners", and when something "goes wrong" they'll say "outside our control" - and Trocador will say "outside their control". Real story, see my review on StealthEx - and I had followed up with Trocador who had ranked him high based on his "maybe, when I feel like it" promise of 30 minutes turnaround.
Update: How do you know they read this review and tacitly accept that my warning was justified? By the fact that they did not answer - they have a good thing going - and they're not going to be held accountable for the black sheep they let graze on our meadow and skim our swaps - a big herd is better than a good one for them.
Update 2: To their credit Trocador not only reacted here (plugging the "outside their control" line) but also reached out to me and offered compensation for the delay. That's as good as it gets in the modern world, of which crypto-finance is a very typical part - whatever were it's founding principles, but then there's not much Jesus left in Christianity, either. There were times when the cratsman that made your Swiss watch stood in for lifelong service and when your Rolls broke down in the Midle East you got spares and repair - and your later offer to pay way rejected ("there was no repair") - and you CAN still buy a Mercedes that can travel comfortably at 120mph without it's rear-bonnet flying off or the wind wheezing/whining through the door-frames and the thunder of turbulences driving you mad - and you are not told that the 120mph is an average you have no claim to - and on some days they may deliver a vehicle which just does 30mph.
Eichendorf again: Hüte Dich, sei wach und munter.
Pro-Tip: You have to grab them where it hurts.
Final Update: Received Trocador's compensation and assurance to monitor their partners and so am closing this case on a positive note bumping up my rating by one.
官方回覆
查看原文 Dear user, after investigating your swap, we found it is now completed. The partner StealthEx had a temporary issue with one of their Liquidity Providers, so they routed your swap to another centralized exchange which waits for a superior number of block confirmations, so that caused a delay on your swap. The ETA we display on Trocador is an average of how much time it takes for a swap, considering all the swaps performed recently on that service. However it is not the same as to say your swap would take exactly a certain amount of time. The important part is that you did receive your funds on your address at the end, and also that our support team provided you help through e-mail. In no circumstance you were left alone. Having said that, our support team is still pursuing StealthEx to refund you the difference from the market rate, and even if they don't do it, we will raise the issue to the Trocador core team. We are glad you find our service excellent, thanks. We hope to solve your issue soon.
The best crypto swap service ever
The best crypto swap service ever, ensuring users satisfactory through execution, reliability, safety and customer support
Deserved the 5 stars ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
查看原文 Ongoing AML Review Experience with…
Ongoing AML Review Experience with EasyBit via Trocador
I am sharing my personal experience so that other users can better understand the potential risks of prolonged AML/KYC reviews when using crypto swap services and exchange aggregators.
This post is not intended as harassment or a definitive accusation.
It reflects my own unresolved experience, timeline, and the documentation I submitted throughout the review process.
Case Information
Platform used: Trocador
Exchange provider: EasyBit
EasyBit Order ID: QR3u******8Qz
Trocador Transaction ID: 22673:26****66
Transaction date:
March 4, 2026
As of today, this case has remained under AML/compliance review for more than two months.
What Happened
I chose to use Trocador because the exchange rates and fees appeared competitive.
After submitting the transaction, the case entered an AML review process and has remained unresolved for an extended period of time.
Throughout this process, I was repeatedly asked to provide extensive verification materials, including:
Government-issued ID
KYC verification
Handwritten declaration
Wallet ownership proof
Source-of-funds explanations
Blockchain transaction history
Continuous unedited verification video
I fully cooperated with every request made by the compliance team.
Documents and Proof Submitted
To comply with the review, I submitted:
Full unedited verification video
Face + ID confirmation
Handwritten signed declaration
Exodus wallet ownership proof
Transaction flow explanations
Blockchain explorer references
Additional follow-up clarifications
Wallet activity explanations
Some files were uploaded through Google Drive because email attachment limits were exceeded.
Important Technical Context
One important issue is that I use the Exodus wallet.
Exodus is an HD wallet that automatically generates multiple internal/change addresses.
Some addresses involved in transactions are not always directly visible inside the wallet interface itself.
I explained this multiple times and provided blockchain references and transaction flow explanations to support this.
I also explained that Exodus does not currently support traditional message signing.
Main Concern
My concern is not that AML reviews exist.
I understand compliance reviews are part of the crypto industry.
The difficult part has been:
Extremely long delays
Repeated requests for additional information
Unclear remaining concerns
Lack of concrete timelines
Long periods without meaningful updates
At one stage, I was informed that the case had been escalated to the review team and that I should receive an update “within the next few days.”
However, additional long waiting periods followed afterward without meaningful resolution.
Why I Am Posting This
I am posting this because I believe users should understand the possible risks associated with:
Prolonged compliance holds
Restricted access to funds
Repeated verification requests
Uncertain resolution timelines
I hope:
My case can eventually be resolved fairly
Future users can make informed decisions before using these services
Current Status
As of today:
The case remains unresolved
The review is still ongoing
I am still waiting for either a final resolution or refund decision
If the situation is eventually resolved, I will update this post accordingly.
I still hope the situation can be resolved professionally and fairly.
Advice to Other Users
If you use swap services or exchange aggregators:
Keep complete transaction records
Save all emails and screenshots
Record TXIDs carefully
Avoid deleting P2P communication history
Be prepared for source-of-funds questions
Understand that HD wallets can complicate ownership verification
I hope this information helps other users avoid similar situations and make informed decisions.
查看原文 confiable
recomendable totalmente
查看原文 Excelente exchange
Excelente exchange, muy confiable y rapido
查看原文 Always a pleasure with Trocador
I just exchanged over €1800 of BTC for Monero on the BNB blockchain, and the transaction was completed in less than a minute. It couldn't be better.
查看原文 Great Platform and Support
After many flawless transactions in the past, something went wrong this time. My deposit was confirmed on the blockchain, but I never received the swapped tokens.
However, this was no reason to panic as I knew Trocador as a reputable platform. Therefore I contacted support via telegram (they responded in +-30min) and explained the issue. Support immediately contacted the partner exchange I chose for the trade and helped me get my tokens refunded in around 2 hours.
In short: I can recommend Trocador to anyone!
查看原文 風險因素
更新時間: 2026年8月1日
沒有可用的風險因素