UCard Radar

Card comparison

MetaMask Card vs SafePal Card: Wallet-Card Models, Asset Management, and Usage Risks

Share article

Share via

XWeiboFacebookLinkedInWhatsAppTelegram

MetaMask Card and SafePal Card both combine a wallet, crypto assets, and Mastercard within one product ecosystem, but their payment paths are not the same. Do not focus only on how many chains and tokens each wallet supports. The key question is where the money is actually deducted from when the card is used.

MetaMask Card pays from wallet assets that the user has authorized. Before a purchase, the assets remain in the user's own MetaMask wallet. When a transaction occurs, the system converts the designated token on the designated network into fiat currency and completes the Mastercard authorization.

SafePal Card, by contrast, connects to the Fiat24 banking-account system. The user must first open a personal Swiss IBAN, transfer crypto assets into the Banking Gateway, convert them into an account balance, and then spend from that balance. The SafePal App is the entry point, while the account, compliance review, and card balance are primarily handled within the Fiat24 system.

In simple terms:

MetaMask Card deducts authorized on-chain assets; SafePal Card deducts the balance of a Fiat24 bank account.

This difference affects custody, funding flows, refunds, fees, and the risk of funds being restricted or frozen.

Original UCard Radar infographic: MetaMask Card vs SafePal Card: Wallet-Card Models, Asset Management, and Usage Risks

Scope of Sources and Conclusions

Primary-source verification: MetaMask Card; SafePal Banking Gateway; Set up Apple Pay.

The verifiable facts in this article concerning the issuance model, regional eligibility, and wallet-payment capabilities of MetaMask and SafePal card products are based on the listed official or regulatory documents. Actual service status, fees, eligibility, and regional coverage should be confirmed on the issuer's or platform's pages at the time of application.

Different issuers, regions, account tiers, and merchant rules may produce different outcomes. Any user experience, success-rate comparison, fee comparison, or trend assessment not directly disclosed by the primary sources above should be treated as analysis or inference and has not been officially confirmed by the relevant institutions for individual cases.

Comparison of the Two Cards

Comparison Item

MetaMask Card

SafePal Card

Card model

Wallet-authorized spending

Bank-account debit card

Main service providers

Crypto Life, Baanx, Monovate, Mastercard

SafePal, Fiat24, Mastercard

Source of payment funds

Authorized designated tokens in the MetaMask wallet

Balance in a Fiat24 Swiss IBAN account

Need to fund a card account first

No separate top-up is required, but tokens must be authorized

Funds must be transferred into the banking gateway

Location of funds before payment

User's self-custody wallet

Fiat24 account system

Bank account

None

Personal Swiss IBAN

Card form

Virtual card; new metal-card orders are paused

Current information mainly refers to a virtual Mastercard

Apple Pay / Google Pay

Supported

Supported

KYC provider

Crypto Life

Fiat24

Main risks

Authorization, Gas, on-chain confirmation, network congestion

KYC, source-of-funds review, account or card restrictions

Best suited for

Existing MetaMask users willing to manage on-chain approvals

Users who want IBAN, bank transfers, and card spending in one system

SafePal Wallet does support more assets, but that does not mean SafePal Mastercard can spend those assets directly. Conversely, although MetaMask Card is closer to a “direct-from-wallet” model, the number of supported networks and tokens is clearly smaller.

MetaMask Card: Paying from Designated Wallet Assets

After activating MetaMask Card, the user must select the wallet account, network, and token that may be used for spending, and set a spending cap. The funds remain in the original wallet before payment, the authorization can be revoked, and the card cannot charge more than the configured limit.

When the card is used, the system deducts the corresponding amount from the authorized token and converts it into fiat currency such as U.S. dollars, euros, or pounds sterling to complete the Mastercard transaction. Each transaction also incurs a small amount of on-chain Gas.

The range of assets currently supported for spending is relatively limited:

Network

Supported Assets

Linea

mUSD, USDC, USDT, wETH, EURe, GBPe

Solana

USDC, USDT

Base

USDC, USDT

Monad

USDC

Users in New York and Texas can currently use only Linea and Base, not Solana or Monad. Having ETH, BNB, ARB, or DAI in the wallet does not mean those assets can be spent directly with the card. Usually, assets must first be moved onto a supported network and then exchanged for a supported stablecoin or wETH.

So “spending directly from the wallet” does not mean that any token can be used. It means spending pre-authorized assets on designated networks.

SafePal Card: Move Funds into a Fiat24 Account First, Then Spend from the Balance

SafePal Wallet itself is non-custodial. Users control the private keys for its software wallet, browser extension, and hardware wallets such as the S1, S1 Pro, and X1. The Banking Gateway and SafePal Mastercard, however, are a separate service layer.

Users must open a Fiat24 account from the Bank section of the SafePal App, complete identity and address verification, and obtain a personal Swiss IBAN plus a co-branded virtual Mastercard. The official flow is:

Crypto assets → Deposit into SafePal Banking Gateway → Convert to bank-account balance → Spend with SafePal Mastercard

The official user guide states that deposited crypto assets are automatically converted into euros and credited to the bank account. Once the card is activated, it can be linked to PayPal, Apple Pay, Google Pay, or Samsung Pay.

This means SafePal Card does not directly deduct BTC, ETH, or USDT from an S1 hardware wallet. To spend, the funds must first be transferred into Fiat24's banking gateway. Once there, the funds are no longer cold-wallet assets waiting to be spent; they become an account balance governed by account rules.

Coins Supported by the Wallet Are Not the Same as Coins the Card Can Spend

SafePal App claims support for more than 200 blockchains and a large number of tokens, far more than the four spending networks currently supported by MetaMask Card. However, SafePal Mastercard actually uses fiat currency or fiat-mapped assets in a Fiat24 account.

Fiat24 records account assets such as EUR24, USD24, and CHF24 on Arbitrum, corresponding to euro, U.S. dollar, and Swiss franc balances. When funds leave the account, the corresponding assets decrease as well.

There is an important pitfall here. SafePal warns that if EUR24, USD24, or CHF24 is transferred to a wallet that is not registered with Fiat24, the assets may be frozen. Continued access may only be possible if the corresponding account-credential NFT is transferred together with the assets. If the assets are sent to a wallet for which the user does not control the private key, the funds may be unrecoverable.

These assets may look like ordinary on-chain tokens, but they should not be transferred casually like conventional stablecoins.

Which One Is Closer to Self-Custody?

Judging by the state of funds before a card transaction, MetaMask Card is closer to self-custody. The user grants only a limited allowance for specific tokens, while the funds remain in the user's own wallet. The allowance can be capped and revoked at any time.

SafePal needs to be separated into two layers. Its wallet and hardware wallets are non-custodial, but the Banking Gateway and Mastercard are Fiat24 banking services. While the funds remain in the wallet, the user controls the private keys. Once the funds enter the banking gateway and are converted into an account balance, they become subject to Fiat24's account, compliance, and card rules.

A recent SafePal X1 review on Reddit also noted that the wallet is self-custodial, while the built-in banking service requires identity verification and fiat balances are managed by a partner. These two categories of assets should not be treated as the same thing.

KYC and Application Regions

A standard MetaMask wallet does not require identity documents, but applying for MetaMask Card requires KYC. Identity data is collected and processed by Crypto Life, and MetaMask states that it does not receive the personal identity information users submit to Crypto Life.

SafePal Wallet also does not impose mandatory KYC, but opening a Fiat24 account requires more extensive banking verification, including email, mobile number, residential address, precise mobile-device location, address-distance verification, passport scanning, ReadID checks, and a beneficial-owner declaration. Its account-opening guide states that address verification may fail if the user's current location is more than 2 kilometers away from the submitted address. The relevant information is retained by Fiat24.

MetaMask Card is available in selected countries and regions, including Canada, most EU countries, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, as well as Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Chile, Uruguay, Bahrain, Oman, and others. As of this verification, new card applications have been paused in the United States and the United Kingdom, while existing cardholders are unaffected. New users can mainly apply only for the free virtual card, and new metal-card orders have been suspended since June 2, 2026.

SafePal Banking Gateway has two regional tiers. Accounts with Mastercard support have a combined monthly transaction limit of USD 100,000, while accounts without Mastercard support are limited to USD 1,000. The official FAQ places mainland China accounts in the USD 100,000 tier, but opening an account still requires passing Fiat24's identity, passport, address, and geolocation checks. Being listed as a supported region does not guarantee approval.

Fees and Limits

The free MetaMask virtual card has no annual or maintenance fee. The metal card has an annual fee of USD 199 but is currently unavailable for new orders. The main fees are:

Item

Free Virtual Card Rule

Annual fee

0

Spending in a locally denominated stablecoin

0

Stablecoin with a currency mismatch

0.5%

Other crypto assets such as wETH

0.875%

On-chain Gas

Variable; official example is about USD 0.01

Cross-border transaction

1%

ATM withdrawal

2%

Per-transaction spending limit

USD 10,000

Daily spending limit

USD 15,000

Actual costs also depend on the user's country, the merchant's country, the asset used, and the card tier. A stablecoin denominated in the local transaction currency is usually cheaper. Using wETH or making a cross-border payment may result in additional conversion or cross-border fees.

SafePal's current fee page lists the following rules:

Item

Current Rule

Account-opening fee, account-management fee, standard deposit fee

0

Non-USD Mastercard transaction

1%

Internal account transfer

0

External bank transfer

No fee charged by SafePal or Fiat24

Refund processing fee

USD 1 / EUR 1 / CHF 1 / CNY 7

On-chain operation

Gas required

One point in the two official SafePal documents is worth checking. The user guide says deposits are automatically converted into euros, while the fee page updated in May 2026 lists a 1% currency-conversion fee for non-USD Mastercard transactions. Before using the service, it is best to confirm in the App which balance a deposit is converted into, which account the card debits first, whether a merchant transaction in a different currency triggers a fee, and whether currency can be exchanged in advance.

SafePal's limits also combine bank transfers, foreign exchange, and card spending. For users who need a high daily card-spending limit, MetaMask's limits are more straightforward. For users who need banking inflows and outflows, SafePal's USD 100,000 monthly tier is more useful, although different types of transactions share the same overall limit.

Refunds Do Not Return in the Original Token

Refunds on MetaMask Card are not returned directly in the USDT, USDC, or wETH originally used. The refund first enters Credits on the card page and is used first for the next purchase. Users can also withdraw the amount manually, in which case they receive mUSD. Paying with USDT does not mean the refund will be received in USDT. Users concerned about exchange rates or tax records should separately record the conversions that occur at the time of payment and refund.

SafePal Card refunds enter the Fiat24 card and banking-account system and are subject to a processing fee of USD 1, EUR 1, CHF 1, or CNY 7 per refund, depending on the refund currency. For frequent small refunds, this fixed fee can become noticeable.

User Feedback: Do Not Blame Every Wallet Problem on the Card

In Reddit feedback about MetaMask Card, one user reported that a small in-person purchase was declined by Curve for insufficient balance, with both PIN and contactless payments failing. A previous small card-verification transaction also remained pending. Another user reported paying with GBPe: the wallet was debited, but because final confirmation on Linea was slow, the card transaction was declined and the funds later appeared in Credits.

These examples do not represent every user, but they highlight a practical issue. Traditional card payments only need to check the issuer's system balance, while MetaMask Card also depends on on-chain execution and confirmation. An on-chain action may already have occurred even though POS authorization fails to complete in time. Situations requiring very fast authorization—such as subway gates, vending machines, or fuel pumps—are particularly worth testing with a small amount first.

There is less Reddit discussion specifically about SafePal Card. Most posts still concern hardware wallets, seed phrases, DApps, Swap, or third-party mini-apps. One user who already had another Fiat24 co-branded card encountered restrictions when applying for SafePal Card. Community members suggested that opening a second card may not be possible. This is only an individual case, but it reminds users that different brand front ends may not correspond to separate Fiat24 backend accounts.

Complaints about SafePal Swap freezes and processing delays should also not be treated directly as evidence of Mastercard payment success rates. When reviewing feedback, hardware wallets, software wallets, Swap / third-party mini-apps, Fiat24 accounts, and Mastercard itself should at minimum be evaluated separately.

Trustpilot can likewise serve only as a supplementary reference. As of July 22, 2026, MetaMask had about 654 reviews, a TrustScore of 1.4, and roughly 85% one-star ratings. SafePal had about 386 reviews, a TrustScore of 3.1, with approximately 57% five-star and 37% one-star ratings. SafePal's overall score is higher, but MetaMask reviews mix wallet, Swap, Bridge, customer-support, phishing, and seed-phrase-leak issues. SafePal reviews likewise mix customer support, withdrawal delays, third-party mini-apps, refund explanations, and impersonation calls. Trustpilot itself does not verify the specific facts in every review, so the overall score cannot be treated as a card-payment success rate.

A more useful way to evaluate feedback is to look at whether customer support responds consistently, whether complaints cluster around freezes or refunds, whether impersonation scams are frequent, and how the company responds to negative reviews. In July 2026, one SafePal user said a caller possessed some of their personal information and attempted to direct them to a fake support website. SafePal replied that it does not proactively contact users to provide assistance and instructed the user to submit a ticket through the official website. This individual case does not prove that a data breach occurred, but targeted phishing is a real risk that requires caution.

What Risks Should Each Card User Watch For?

For MetaMask Card, the key issues are wallet authorization and on-chain execution. Before using the card, users should confirm which account and token have been authorized, whether the allowance is unnecessarily high, whether enough Gas is available on the network, whether block confirmation is operating normally, and whether the wallet has ever connected to a suspicious DApp.

According to the official explanation, even if a wallet is compromised, an attacker cannot directly use MetaMask Card because the card and wallet use separate credentials. This does not mean the wallet assets are safe. Anyone who obtains the private key or seed phrase can still transfer the assets directly. Card-number leakage and private-key leakage are two different risks, and either can result in losses.

For SafePal Card, the key issue is the bank account and the rules of its service partners. After funds enter the Banking Gateway, they may be restricted due to inconsistent KYC information, a mismatch between location and address, insufficient explanation of the source of funds, high-risk on-chain addresses, unusual transactions, sanctions screening, or anti-money-laundering checks. This is closer to the compliance risk of an ordinary bank or exchange account.

SafePal App integrates hardware wallets, software wallets, Swap, third-party mini-apps, Fiat24 accounts, and Mastercard into one interface. A unified interface does not mean that the service providers are the same, nor does it mean that funds are held under the same custody model. A hardware wallet can improve private-key security, but it cannot replace Fiat24's KYC, card-risk controls, or refund procedures.

How to Choose and Use Them More Safely

If you already use MetaMask extensively, hold USDC or USDT on Linea, Base, Solana, or Monad, and want your money to remain under your control until the moment of spending, MetaMask Card is more suitable. It does not provide a personal IBAN and is not an ideal substitute for a conventional bank card for users who do not understand token approvals, Gas, and on-chain confirmation.

If you need a Swiss IBAN, bank transfers, crypto deposits and withdrawals, and everyday card spending within one App, SafePal Card offers a more complete set of functions. In substance, however, the model is “SafePal provides the interface, while Fiat24 provides the bank account and Mastercard.” Money intended for spending must first enter the banking gateway.

Whichever card you use, do not place long-term assets and everyday spending funds at the same security level:

Keep long-term assets in a cold wallet; use a hot wallet for on-chain interactions; keep only near-term spending amounts in the card wallet or bank account; and maintain a backup card in case of a decline or account freeze.

With MetaMask Card, you can create a separate spending wallet containing only the stablecoins you expect to use over the next month and restrict authorization to that account and spending limit. Do not directly authorize the card to access the main wallet holding long-term assets, NFTs, or DeFi positions.

With SafePal Card, a hardware wallet is better used as the long-term asset layer and the Fiat24 account as the spending layer. Transfer only the balance needed in the near term instead of leaving large amounts there for long periods.

Ultimately, the question is not “which wallet is safer, MetaMask or SafePal?” The real comparison is the payment structure you want: a bank card that remains connected to authorized self-custodied assets, or a system in which crypto assets are first converted into a bank-account balance that can receive and make payments.

Sources and verification dates

These accessible sources support key facts, regulatory status, or service status in this article. Each note defines its scope.

Page verified: Jul 29, 2026
  1. MetaMask Card

    Official sourceAccessed: Jul 29, 2026

    适用地区:MetaMask Card 已开放地区|用于核验:卡片产品、可用性和持卡人条件。
  2. SafePal Banking Gateway

    Official sourceAccessed: Jul 29, 2026

    适用地区:SafePal/Fiat24 支持的居住地和项目条款|用于核验:IBAN、虚拟 Mastercard、费用和适用地区。
  3. Set up Apple Pay

    Official sourceAccessed: Jul 29, 2026

    适用地区:Apple Pay 已支持的国家和地区及合作发卡方|用于核验:添加支付卡的条件和发卡行支持要求。